Glush

Hong Kong action cinema icon Jackie Chan, previously resolute in his pledge to donate his vast fortune entirely to charity, appears to be reviewing his philanthropic commitment, with reports suggesting he may allocate a portion of his substantial estate to family members. The veteran actor, 71, whose wealth is estimated at approximately HK$117 billion (S$1.95 billion), famously announced in 2011 his intention to bypass his children in his will.

Recent developments indicate a shift in perspective, with plans reportedly underway to provide ongoing financial support for his immediate family. This potential redistribution includes his wife, Lin Fengjiao, and his son, Jaycee Chan. Crucially, speculation has also arisen regarding the inclusion of his long-estranged daughter, Etta Ng, in the revised will.

A Decade of Estrangement and Public Scrutiny

Born in 1999 from Chan’s extramarital relationship with former actress Elaine Ng, Etta Ng has maintained a distant and often volatile relationship with both parents. Following her birth, Chan reportedly severed contact with the mother and daughter.

The question of whether Etta Ng will ultimately be named as a beneficiary remains a source of public intrigue. Hong Kong legal standards necessitate the explicit designation of an individual within a will for them to receive an inheritance. Etta, who has faced significant financial hardship and garnered headlines for alleged periods of instability, including purported sightings at a Canadian soup kitchen in 2022, has maintained a fiercely independent stance.

In prior statements, Ng has publicly minimized her father’s influence, declaring in a high-profile 2015 interview that Chan “never existed” in her life and that she did not regard him as a parent. Despite her struggles, Ng recently surfaced in Hong Kong, operating a street stall in Mongkok where she sells hand-painted clothing.

Complex Family Dynamics and Independence

The complex family dynamic extends to Ng’s relationship with her mother, Elaine Ng. Etta, who married social media influencer Andi Autumn in 2018, once took legal action against her mother, though she later claimed the intent was to secure professional help for her. Elaine Ng recently confirmed during a livestream event that she had not seen her daughter in over two years.

When celebrating her marriage, Etta used social media to articulate a worldview prioritizing chosen relationships over biological ties, stating, “A home is with the family that you can choose, and with that we are never alone. Love is undoubtedly stronger than blood.”

The celebrity’s potential decision to extend financial consideration to Etta marks a pivotal turn from his long-held public commitment to philanthropy. While the extent of any revised financial provision remains undetermined, the deliberation reflects the enduring tension between public legacy and private familial responsibility for one of Asia’s most recognizable figures.

Expert observers suggest that such a highly visible reconsideration of an estate plan often underscores the enduring, non-monetary value of addressing complex family relationships, even late in life. Any official confirmation regarding changes to the will would signal a significant shift in Chan’s approach to securing his private legacy alongside his extensive charitable contributions.

During a recent guest appearance at fellow celebrity Jordan Chan’s concert in mainland China, Hong Kong actor Michael Tse ignited a lively discussion on social media with an impromptu dance performance that deviated significantly from the romantic ballad he was singing. The 58-year-old performer, known widely for his role as “Laughing Gor,” chose David Tao’s 1997 hit “I Love You” for his segment. However, during the song’s instrumental interlude, Tse unexpectedly transitioned into a highly suggestive solo dance routine, surprising and entertaining the live audience while prompting mixed reactions from online observers.

Tse, who reportedly has professional training as a dancer, incorporated vigorous hip movements and provocative gestures into his performance, including noticeable instances of self-caressing. The spectacle stood in stark contrast to the slow, emotional tone of the classic Mandopop ballad. Footage of the routine, which quickly circulated across various platforms, showed concert attendees reacting with audible cheers and laughter, seemingly delighted by the unscripted departure from the scheduled performance.

While the live audience appeared thoroughly amused by the veteran actor’s sudden display of energetic moves, the reaction among digital commentators was noticeably less positive. Netizens expressed sharp criticism regarding the perceived vulgarity and unsuitability of the choreography, particularly within the context of a public concert broadcast.

Many online critiques focused on attributing the performance to a perceived need for excessive showmanship. Comments ranged from accusations that Tse was “trying too hard” to suggestions that the audience’s eyesight needed cleansing after witnessing the “strange self-caressing dance.” One particularly pointed comment questioned the motivation behind the display, asking whether such “oily” behavior was a prerequisite for success in the competitive Chinese entertainment industry.

The incident highlights a growing disconnect between the preferences of live event audiences and the increasingly critical standards of online commentators, particularly concerning performances deemed suggestive or overly flamboyant. Tse’s history as an established actor and singer, coupled with his technical dancing background, suggests the performance may have simply been a spontaneous moment of immersion. Yet, the viral spread of the footage means the incident has transformed into a public discourse on appropriate conduct for seasoned performers in the digital age.

This event serves as an important case study regarding the shifting dynamics of celebrity performance and public reception. Today’s entertainers face immediate scrutiny across global boundaries, emphasizing the need for stars to navigate the fine line between engaging spontaneity and maintaining a public image acceptable to a vast, diverse, and often judgmental online audience. Whether Tse’s actions were simply an irrepressible artistic urge or a calculated attempt to inject energy remains unclear, but the enduring viral debate underscores the power of social media to frame and dissect celebrity moments.

A devastating residential fire, reportedly the worst in Hong Kong in nearly eight decades, swept through the Wang Fuk Court housing complex on Thursday, November 27th, triggering a massive emergency response that simultaneously focused on saving human lives and trapped animals. The conflagration tragically claimed the lives of at least 128 people, including one firefighter, with reports indicating 79 injuries and 16 bodies still unaccounted for. Amidst the chaos and tragedy, the extraordinary efforts by rescue teams to extract stranded pets—including cats, dogs, and even turtles—from the high-rise blocks have ignited a profound public discussion regarding rescue protocols during large-scale disasters.

Firefighters Exceed Expectations in Multi-Species Rescue

The inferno necessitated a full mobilization of emergency services, where firefighters were seen navigating smoke-filled and rapidly deteriorating structures to locate residents and animals. One notable example involved a firefighter, identified as Hua Zai, who was credited with successfully rescuing a child alongside nine cats and a dog from Block D of the complex. Animal welfare organizations, including dozens of officers from local groups, swiftly deployed to the scene with specialized oxygenated pet carriers and ambulances.

The focus on animal rescue was substantial. To date, preliminary tallies suggest more than 92 animals have been retrieved, although this figure includes fatalities. Estimates placed the number of animals trapped or missing inside the ruins at over 100. The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) has established a crucial support hub near Kwong Lai House in Kwong Fuk Tsuen, offering temporary shelter, medical care, and reunification services for the rescued pets.

The Ethical Dilemma of Disaster Triage

While many residents lauded the sheer dedication of the firefighters for their efforts, the intense focus on animal extraction became a source of controversy within Hong Kong media and online forums. Some critics argued that human life should maintain absolute priority, suggesting that resources—specifically time and manpower—dedicated to retrieving pets could have been better utilized to save more people.

“Time spent saving animals could have saved more people,” stated one commenter, reflecting the view that disaster triage should exclusively prioritize human survival.

However, a strong counter-narrative emerged from other members of the public, including pet owners, who passionately defended the actions of the rescue teams. Many argued that companion animals are viewed as integral family members, asserting their intrinsic value. One widely shared sentiment underscored that fire and rescue personnel do not typically possess the luxury of “choosing” whom to save in a chaotic disaster environment.

As one netizen succinctly summarized the complex situation: “Just because they rescued animals doesn’t mean they gave up on saving people.” This perspective suggests that effective disaster response is often multifaceted, addressing all forms of life encountered during search and rescue operations.

The unprecedented event at Wang Fuk Court not only highlights the devastating impact of large-scale residential fires but also brings to the forefront the evolving ethical considerations of multi-species recovery in urban emergencies. Emergency planners and animal welfare groups may leverage this incident to refine and better integrate protocols for rescue and post-disaster care involving both human residents and their beloved pets.